Results of Postoperative Instillation of Mitomycin C in Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer after Complete Resection Versus BCG (Recurrence and Progression)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

The Departments of Urology, Maadi Military Hospital* and Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Al -Azhar University**, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Abstract
Background: Intravesical immunotherapy or chemotherapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer is a well-established treatment for preventing or delaying tumour recurrence after tumour resection. However, up to 70% of patients may fail. New protocols and new intravesical agents with improved effectiveness are needed
Aim of Study: Is to evaluate the oncological outcome as regard progression, local recurrence and side effects of non-muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder managed by complete resection followed by postop-erative intravesical instillation of Mitomycin C compared with BCG.
Patients and Methods: This is a prospective study that included 51 patients with non-muscle invasive TCC bladder (Ta and T1) at Urology Department, Al-Azhar University hospitals between 2011 and 2015. Patients divided into two groups, the Mitomycin group received immediate MMC and periodic 6 doses of MMC and the other group, BCG received 6 doses of BCG one dose per week. Follow-up by cystoscope for two years at 3th, 6th, 9th, 12th, 18th, 24th month to detect the recurrence, progression and side effects.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 60.58 (37 yrs. - 79 yrs.) in the MMC group and 61.76 (48 yrs-83 yrs) in the BCG group. The main comparison in this study is recurrence rate and progression rate of the tumor. Three patients (11.5%) had recurrence in the 1st year while four patients (15.4%) in the 2nd year with total recurrence seven patients (26.9%) in MMC group.
In the BCG group, patients who had a recurrence in the 1st year were, two patients (8%) and three patients (12%) in the 2nd year with total recurrence, five patients (20%).
The total progression in two years were 4 pts (15.38%) (One patient (3.8%) in the 1st year) (3 patients (11.5%) in the 2nd year) in the MMC group while were 4 pts (16%) (One patient (4%) in the 1st year) (year 3 patients (12%) in the 2nd year) in the BCG group.
Conclusion: Our study confirmed the positive effect of immediate Mitomycin C intravesical instillation in patients who received periodic Mitomycin C instillation and either the positive effect of intravesical instillation of BCG in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder tumors. Our present study showed that MMC and BCG equally reduced recurrence and progression in NMIBC patients while showed the superiority of MMC regarding to the adverse effects.

Keywords